- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@srl.rmit.EDU.AU>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 19:21:47 +1100 (EST)
- To: Isaac Kute <IKute@compuserve.com>
- cc: WWW Accessibility Forum <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, Main EASI users forum <EASI@MAELSTROM.STJOHNS.EDU>
Several comments in no special order: Unless you have a commitment to do an awful lot of work you will find that maintaining three sets of pages is too difficult. I notice that at the moment the three are very different - I struggled to find much consistency between versions. I would suggest producing one version, and using a search and replace to change the FONT or apply a different Style sheet (or both) in order to provide a version for ordinary type as well as one with large font, high contrast. (Alternatively, some help for users on how to specify their own fonts would obviate even that requirement.) Consistency is particularly important for users who are making use of a range of technologies (for example screenreader at work, high contrast/large print at home, magnified version (eg Opera) at the library). The Screenreader version has no meaningful markup - this makes it a very poor cousin to the other versions. A screenreader would be better off using a properly marked up, accessible version of the framed version, This effectively requires a sensible use of NOFRAMES in the Frameset page, and links on each page (which are there anyway) In a high-contrast large print version it would have made more sense to enlarge the images. These are my first impressions, and it seems to me that all of these are reasonably important problems which can be relatively simply solved at this stage. regards Charles McCathieNevile On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Isaac Kute wrote: > Hello everyone. > > I'm carrying out some research on the Royal London Society for the Blind > web site, with the view of suggesting improvements to its current format > and accessibility. > > I would appreciate if participants would take a few moments to browse the > site and provide feedback on its current format and accessibility. > Suggestions, comments and constructive critisism will be greatly > appreciated. > > You can also forward the comments directly to me using the return path to > this message. > > The address is: > > http://www.rlsb.org.uk > > Thank you for your time. > > Isaac Kute > Adaptive Technology Centre > Dorton College of Further Education > RLSB > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 1998 03:25:54 UTC