- From: David Poehlman <poehlman@clark.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 16:13:25 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ~dix~ <dixx@earthlink.net>
- cc: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
No, no, no! That's not the point I was trying to make. we get too caught up in the words. If you ask one person what they like to be lwbeled as, your answer will be different than that which you get when you ask another, but the end is the aame. we need to pick wise choices, but need not concern ourselves with bruising the felling of adults. we are all adults right? I am blind as someone else said. that is a fact. I have seen the person first rule stated here. it is a good one. all I'm saying here is let's concentrate on the message rather than the trivialities of what words to use when conveying that message insofar as choosing teh most ablolute term for a particular condition or class of conditions. good day? -- Hands-On-Technolog(eye)s touching the internet voice: 1-(301) 949-7599 poehlman@clark.net ftp://ftp.clark.net/pub/poehlman http://www.clark.net/pub/poehlman Dynamic solutions Inc. Best of service for your Small Business network Needs Http://www.dnsolutions.com
Received on Saturday, 3 October 1998 16:13:28 UTC