- From: Joe Roeder <Jroeder@nib.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 13:52:56 -0500
- To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org>
- Cc: WAI I G <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Hi Harvey, Thanks for your posting and noting that the credit for that framed site was <!-- Lotus Domino Web Server Release 4.51 (Gold, Build 202 on Windows From some of the other responses to your post, I'm not sure everyone realize that you were pointing out that the "author" of that site was not a person, but a computer program. I think there is a very great threat to accessability on the web here. Automatic web authoring programs are bound to have a lot of appeal because of the obvious financial benefits. If these programs crank out inaccessable web pages, the number of inaccessable sites will proliferate at a very rapid rate. As I understand it, Lotus Domino can build a web page using elements of a data base and the data base can contain purely graphical elements. From all the discussion on alt text, etc., I don't see how a computer program is ever going to be smart enough to know how a graphic should be described. This would take a very sophisticated artificial intelligence program. Is anyone addressing how text descriptions are going to be linked to the graphics in this situation? Joe Roeder Voice: (703) 578-6524 FAX: (703) 998-4217 E-mail: jroeder@nib.org > ---------- > From: Harvey Bingham[SMTP:hbingham@ACM.org] > Sent: Saturday, March 07, 1998 11:36 PM > To: WAI IG > Subject: RE: Frames sites. > > At 00:09 1998/03/08 +1100, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > >... > > > >(My pet example of Framed sites I hate is www.melbourne.org and the > most > >depressing thing about it was that they asked my advice, and then > ignored > >it completely. Lynx users will have a particularly bad time with it, > but > >it is easy to demonstrate the problems by reference to such a site) > > > > Thanks for the pertinent URL. > > There is no <body> content. Before it is a <noframes>, with the > message: > go get a browser that supports frames, from Netscape or Microsoft. > > Bobby analysis finds no problems with no content, so this is worth 4 > stars! > > The source tool comment taking credit for producing this accessibility > > disaster is: > > <!-- Lotus Domino Web Server Release 4.51 (Gold, Build 202 on Windows > NT/Intel) --> > > Regards/Harvey Bingham >
Received on Monday, 9 March 1998 13:54:41 UTC