- From: Mike Burks <mburks952@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Sun, 8 Mar 1998 09:10:27 -0500
- To: "WAI IG" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "Harvey Bingham" <hbingham@ACM.org>
I agree this is one of the most inaccessible sites I have ever seen. In addition it takes to long to load if it loads at all. Basically a terrible site all around....any chance we could put up a list of inaccessible sites and include this one on it? Just a thought, Mike Burks The opinions expressed here are my own and not necessarily those of my employer. -----Original Message----- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@ACM.org> To: WAI IG <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Date: Sunday, March 08, 1998 2:54 AM Subject: RE: Frames sites. >At 00:09 1998/03/08 +1100, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >>... >> >>(My pet example of Framed sites I hate is www.melbourne.org and the most >>depressing thing about it was that they asked my advice, and then ignored >>it completely. Lynx users will have a particularly bad time with it, but >>it is easy to demonstrate the problems by reference to such a site) >> > >Thanks for the pertinent URL. > >There is no <body> content. Before it is a <noframes>, with the message: >go get a browser that supports frames, from Netscape or Microsoft. > >Bobby analysis finds no problems with no content, so this is worth 4 stars! > >The source tool comment taking credit for producing this accessibility >disaster is: > ><!-- Lotus Domino Web Server Release 4.51 (Gold, Build 202 on Windows >NT/Intel) --> > >Regards/Harvey Bingham >
Received on Sunday, 8 March 1998 09:14:25 UTC