- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 12:19:27 -0700
- To: Greg <greglo@microsoft.com>
- CC: "w3c-wai-ig@w3.org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
The difficulties in getting all your software (or even just the software that generates inaccessible HTML code) made accessible are obviously massive and the efforts Bill Gates is instituting are certainly heading the effort in the right direction, despite the reluctance to address the major issue of ALT="text" in the authoring tools. There is one issue on which I should think there would be little or no disagreement: Microsoft's own web sites. Of course, the retrofitting of all the "legacy" sites is being addressed but it will take a lot of time and may not be worth it, HOWEVER, there is absolutely no excuse (or even any logical reason) that would justify publishing any more web sites that do not conform to the guidelines that we have all (including MS reps within WAI) agreed on. I don't expect the browser to get "right" all that soon but the web sites that are published by people under the control of MS's management can be controlled and required to publish no more sites in violation of the guidelines. How long will it take to decide for a cut-off date? Will all new Microsoft web sites be compliant by the end of the year? Or will it be past the end of the millenium? It really shouldn't be beyond the end of the month! What a great kickoff for WAI to be able to announce that by the 4th of July no new inaccessible sites will be posted by MicroSoft - or any Consortium companies! -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 June 1998 15:28:54 UTC