- From: Waddell, Cynthia <cynthia.waddell@ci.sj.ca.us>
- Date: Tue, 26 May 1998 10:46:09 -0700
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, "'love26@gorge.net'" <love26@gorge.net>
The same is true for captioning. There are those, like myself, who will require captioning for videoclips, and there will be those who will not require captioning. Yet, the additional benefit of word searchability helps everyone. Cynthia D. Waddell ADA Coordinator City of San Jose 801 North First Street, Room 460 San Jose, CA 95110-1704 > ---------- > From: love26@gorge.net > Reply To: love26@gorge.net > Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 1998 5:32 AM > To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org > Subject: Right on! > > Len writes: "Anyway, that's how I feel. But really, how I feel or how > any other sighted person feels about this is irrelevant. The only > relevant thing is that there are some people who are blind or have low > vision want the descriptions, and therefore they ought to have the > option to get them, while not be forced to do so. I think everyone > would agree with that?" > > WL:: Every once in a while somebody sums up my sense of what matters so > perfectly that all I can do is quote and vote. I second Len's motion. > > > -- > Love. > ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE > http://dicomp.pair.com >
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 1998 13:56:41 UTC