- From: David Norris <kg9ae@geocities.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 04:19:47 -0500
- To: "W3c-Wai-Ig@W3. Org" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "WAI" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
On Thu May/14/98 05:31 UTC, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: >around images in general is something I find helpful - rather than guess >which are links and which are just images, I can easily see (if I was On Thu May/14/98 09:12 UTC, David Norris Commented: Ummm, if bordered images are helpful then why not make them reliable across UAs on your site? Why not add a style which specifies that anchored images should have a border. Rather than hope the UA does it by default. I agree that bordered images are often helpful in this way. I kind of like the hover pseudo-class implemented in IE4. I use it on occasion. It is a great cue for visual users when used to slightly change the border color. That way if it isn't apparently a link then a visual user gets a hint if they pass over it. Will something like hover be added to CSS proper at some point? Kind of tough to call since its nature is basically an event-driven form of the link pseudo-class. I haven't been following CSS developments very closely for a few months. Something like this for anchored image borders: A:Link IMG {Border: 2px ridge #00F;} IE4 Hover pseudo-class: A:Link IMG {Border: 2px ridge #00F;} A:Hover IMG {Border: 2px ridge #10E;} ,David Norris World Wide Web - http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/1652/ Illusionary Web - http://illusionary.dyn.ml.org/ <-- 02:00 - 10:00 GMT Video/Audio Phone - callto:illusionary.dyn.ml.org Page via mail - 412039@pager.mirabilis.com ICQ Universal Internet Number - 412039 E-Mail - kg9ae@geocities.com
Received on Thursday, 14 May 1998 05:20:34 UTC