- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 17:31:50 -0600
- To: "'IG - WAI Interest Group List'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
The Guidelines Group members - you can skip this message. You've seen all this information already. Dear Interest Group members: At the last meeting, we were able to get through about half of the old guidelines, making recommendations and suggestions. Another chunk of work was delegated to the Tables Group, and some parts we just didn't get to. There's also been a tremendous amount of traffic on the various listserves on different ideas. At the last meeting, we also decided to restructure the guidelines. As a result, I was left with a lot of ideas and some directions, but only about a third of the definite decisions. I was uncomfortable in putting together guidelines that would go out as being the WAI guidelines, so we decided here to put together one last set of Trace Center guidelines, which the WAI committee could use as a base for its work. That version is Version 8.0, and is being submitted to the Working Group as a point to begin its efforts on developing the first official WAI guidelines. WHAT WE DID 1) We took all of the recommendations from the last WAI meeting, and incorporated them. These included the rewordings, the specific new items, the relative ranking, the decision to include but separate the recommendations for page authors, browser developers, and screen reader developers, etc. 2) We conducted a sweep of the web, identifying large numbers of guidelines, which we pored over to make sure that we captured as many issues and ideas as possible. (These guidelines are listed in the appendix.) 3) We adopted the four-plus-one-level approach that I proposed at the meeting, and that we voted to try. In this version, we have the Level 4 guidelines as well as several of the Level 3 Quicksheets and Checklists, all in rough draft form. 4) We completely restructured the Level 4 guidelines so that they were in the same basic structural format as HTML 4.0. The thought here was that this would both facilitate review and transfer of ideas by or to the HTML 4.0 group, and help us to make sure that we have in fact covered all of the different issues that might arise. We think this is a helpful way to look at it, but the group can judge. 5) We tried some formatting tricks to try to make the guidelines easier to look at and review, both visually and using screen readers. (For example, we used 1, 2, 3, or 4 asterisk icon to make it easy to visually pick out the most important items. However, screen readers don't usually read three of any character, so we changed asterisks to images and used "one star," "two star," "three star," and "four star" as the alt text. This both solves the screen reader problem and makes it a lot easier for screen readers to read items - e.g., they hear "four star, add alt text to all images" instead of "asterisk asterisk asterisk asterisk, add alt text to all images.") 6) We also tried to capture as much of the discussion on the HC and IG listserves as possible, although some items are still not resolved sufficiently to capture them in the guidelines. LOCATION OF THE CURRENT DRAFT The current draft can be found at http://trace.wisc.edu/docs/html_guidelines/htmlgide.htm WHAT TO DO FROM HERE The guidelines group is reviewing and making changes We have incorporated all those we could - but some have just come in and we are still working. Will try to update again before Monday but Hey it's the weekend so don't expect too much. See you all Monday. Gregg Vanderheiden Co-editor (with Wendy Chisholm) of the Trace Center Web Guidelines And (future) editor (actually scribe and compiler) for the WAI Guidelines Working Group
Received on Friday, 7 November 1997 18:39:21 UTC