- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 11:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
- To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org (HC team)
to follow up on what T. V. Raman said: > > Style sheets should be used to help out in the case of more generic bullets > like redball.gif > I believe that RDF is also pitching itself as a capability for solving the "generic" case. If the red ball is a captive slave of the stylesheet then the stylesheet is a fine place to put its generic text alternative, but if the same red ball is used more widely and independently of the particular stylesheet, we want to look further up the supply chain for where text alternatives can be introduced and propagated through the system. ClipArt libraries of images for use a bullets should contain ALT text nominees up front. > But where a bullet is more specific e.g. *WARNING* > the style sheet is the wrong place to stick that information in. > Agree. CLASSify the item appropriately. -- Al PS: note that in the draft workplan I asked that we create a generic information model of content expressible as text and associated with an image and then look at all the ways the image enters the system and see if we need to be able to explicitly alter the text-item associations at that point or not. The discussion above suggests that we need to be able to set some of these things in the clip art library, in the style, and in the document. Not necessarily one opportunity per attribute, either.
Received on Friday, 26 September 1997 11:14:46 UTC