- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 10:19:03 -0400 (EDT)
- To: w3c-wai-hc@w3.org (HC team)
- Cc: dsr@w3.org, chris@w3.org
Let me soften what I just said. [Daniel and I have been debating whether the WAI team should prepare change proposals as fully-formed change pages or as some kind of a more strategic "change directive."] What I am really reacting to is the sense that the HTML team, at the very least, is extremely tired of making changes by now. For us to want to change things at this late hour, it will make it easier for them to cooperate with us if we can do what we can to make our suggested changes meet the quality standards of fully-tested, plug-and-go drop-in components for their document. That said, I have to face reality. Change pages are a solution; what's the requirement? Perhaps the requirement is that we should be talking to the editors of the HTML and CSS documents to learn what would make their lives easier and try to conform the format we put our change proposals in as closely to what they want as we can. -- Al Gilman
Received on Friday, 26 September 1997 10:19:31 UTC