- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 11:26:09 -0400 ()
- To: dd@w3.org
- cc: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
On Tue, 23 Sep 1997, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > > > Example: > > <link href="dictionary.xml" >> rel="dictionary (abbreviation, phonetic)"> > > Anyone wants to argue whether or not a syntax like: > > <link href="dictionary.xml" rel="dictionary" > class="abbreviation, phonetic"> > > is better or worse ? > Can anyone remind me of the motivation for being able to recognize the link is for a dictionary independent of what kind of dictionary it is? Unless there is a strong motivation for this ability I would have thought that a single rel value for each kind of dictionary would suffice, e.g. rel=abbrev-dict rel=phonetic-dict ... Regards, -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett phone: +44 122 578 2521 (office) +44 385 320 444 (gsm mobile) World Wide Web Consortium (on assignment from HP Labs)
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 1997 11:27:45 UTC