Re: Invisible D link.

• From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
• Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 14:36:05 +0200
• To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>
• cc: WAI HC Working Group <w3c-wai-hc@w3.org>
• Message-Id: <199709221236.OAA14262@www47.inria.fr>

> At a more general level, perhaps the "invisible d-link" idea should be
> regarded as complementing LONGDESC rather than as a substitute for it.

Yes, any solution that doesn't require changes to the HTML spec can be
seen as a guideline who priority will have to be decided in the
Markup guidelines group in time.

> There is an independent argument in support of including LONGDESC (or a
> comparable attribute) in the FRAME element.

Agreed, although the HTML group is still arguing whether TITLE should be
added, so LONGDESC is one shot away.

Received on Monday, 22 September 1997 08:36:22 UTC