Re: CFC - Quarterly WCAG 2 Errata

+1

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*
*Principal ICT Digital Accessibility Architect*


*Senior Product Manager/Compliance/Accessibility **SME*


*W3C Advisory Committee Member and Representative for Knowbility *


*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* *ryladog@gmail.com
<ryladog@gmail.com>* *| **Seneca, SC **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did, but they will
never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.





On Mon, Oct 20, 2025, 6:26 PM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
wrote:

> +1
>
> On 20/10/2025 21:42, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> > Call For Consensus — ends Monday 27th October.
> > There are several small updates to WCAG 2.1 and 2.2, outlined in the
> > errata PR:
> > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4659 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/
> > pull/4659>
> > These are:
> >
> >   *
> >     Rewording the normative preamble of Content on Hover or Focus for
> >     clarity (#4469 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4469>)
> >   *
> >     Changing occurrences of "e-mail" to "email" (#4385 <https://
> >     github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4385>)
> >   *
> >     Removing use of "must" in section 7 preamble (#4458 <https://
> >     github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4458>)
> >   *
> >     Fixing the markup for the notes in the "abbreviation" definition
> >     (#4452 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4452>)
> >   *
> >     Changing capitalized occurrences of "Web" and "Success Criteria" to
> >     match the established lower-case style (#4461 <https://github.com/
> >     w3c/wcag/pull/4461>)
> >
> > These are all changes which have gone through the usual task-force
> > process and been put before the group before.
> >
> > To support the CFC please reply to the group with a “+1”.
> > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have
> > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you
> > not being able to accept this decision, please reply with a “-1” and
> > explanation before the CfC deadline.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > -Alastair
> >
> > --
> >
> > _alastairc.uk <https://alastairc.uk/>_ / _www.thisisgain.com <http://
> > www.nomensa.com/>_
> >
>
> --
> Patrick H. Lauke
>
> * https://www.splintered.co.uk/
> * https://github.com/patrickhlauke
> * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/
> * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke
>
>
>