Re: CFC - Guidance on Applying WCAG 2.2 to Mobile Applications (WCAG2Mobile)

> On 19 Mar 2025, at 11:27, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote:
> 
> 4. Why did the group choose to use WCAG 3.0's "view" definition? This is something that is actively being worked on, and so any change can alter the meaning of WCAG2Mobile guidance

I said this in today's MATF meeting and will repeat here: to me, it actually makes sense to use the current WCAG 3 draft's definition in this First Public Working Draft, _because_ the new thing is in flux. 

My assumption is that the next version of view/ui-context, whatever it ends up being, is used or referenced by a future version of WCAG2Mobile (eg in the next working draft published after there is consensus on a new definition). I also assume we'll continue to seek alignment between AGWG and MATF regarding this definition.