Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues round 2

+1

On 2/25/25 3:10 PM, Chuck Adams wrote:
>
> Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
>
> We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following 
> list of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link: 
> Silver Issues Ready To Close 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>.  
> These are silver issues that I have reviewed since the prior time I 
> have asked for your approval.
>
> These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because 
> either the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the 
> issue has become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.
>
> Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for 
> closing the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening 
> an issue in WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not 
> been satisfactorily resolved.
>
> We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all 
> these issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should 
> remain open.  Any issues you feel should remain open will be 
> transferred from the Silver repository to the WCAG 3 repository for 
> additional review.
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles Adams
>