Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues

+1

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025, 10:58 AM Reid, Wendy <wendy.reid@rakuten.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> *From: *Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
> *Date: *Friday, January 24, 2025 at 3:31 PM
> *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues
>
> *[EXTERNAL] *This message comes from an external organization.
>
> Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
>
>
>
> We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following list
> of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link:  Silver
> Issues Ready To Close
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>
> .
>
>
>
> These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because either
> the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the issue has
> become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.
>
>
>
> Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for closing
> the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening an issue in
> WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not been
> satisfactorily resolved.
>
>
>
> We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all
> these issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should remain
> open.  Any issues you feel should remain open will be transferred from the
> Silver repository to the WCAG 3 repository for additional review.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles Adams
>