Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues

+1

> On Jan 24, 2025, at 3:29 PM, Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
>  
> We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following list of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link:  Silver Issues Ready To Close <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>.
>  
> These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because either the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the issue has become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.
>  
> Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for closing the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening an issue in WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not been satisfactorily resolved.
>  
> We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all these issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should remain open.  Any issues you feel should remain open will be transferred from the Silver repository to the WCAG 3 repository for additional review.  
>  
> Regards,
> Charles Adams