Re: CFC - WCAG 2.2 and 2.1 errata

+1

Kind regards,
Laura

Laura L. Carlson

On Thu, Jun 19, 2025, 6:14 AM Alastair Campbell <
alastair.campbell@thisisgain.com> wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday 26th June at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> There are several minor errata encompassed by this PR which updates the
> errata page:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4370
>
>
>
> The changes to the TR doc are listed and linked to in the description of
> that issue, and here:
>
>
>
>    - Switching the position of User Inactivity and User Interface to make
>    them listed alphabetically #4256
>    <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4256>
>    - Amend definition of motion animation to *not* exclude blurring #4040
>    <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4040>
>    - link directly to new supplemental guidance #2296
>    <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2296>
>    - Harmonise spelling for "breakpoint" #4165
>    <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4165>
>
>
>
> These updates have all been through the usual group-review process, this
> CFC is to agree to add these as errata. It is not a re-publication; they
> will only be listed on the errata pages until there is a re-publication of
> WCAG 2.1/2.2.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you not being
> able to accept this decision, please let the group know before the CfC
> deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> alastairc.uk / www.thisisgain.com <http://www.nomensa.com/>
>
>
>
>
>