Re: AGWG: Please review proposal to close Silver issues third round

+1

On Tue, 1 Apr 2025 at 18:33, Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com> wrote:

> Members of the Accessibility Guidelines Working Group,
>
>
>
> We are asking you to review and approve the closure of the following list
> of silver issues, which can be found by using the following link:  Silver
> Issues Ready To Close
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/silver/issues?q=is*3Aissue*20state*3Aopen*20label*3A*22survey*20*3A*20ready*20for*22__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!ZmTOhK30xT1_qOSRwBzxsFs1JVXsw75EFzHmApEYoJnOfnRhJEUPpU3FLG3qCFiJs-UFt_cknRNKLotc9onpJA$>.
> These are silver issues that I or Francis have reviewed since the prior
> time I have asked for your approval.
>
>
>
> These issues are four or more years old, and can be closed because either
> the issue has been addressed in the current WCAG 3 draft or the issue has
> become irrelevant due to changes of content in the WCAG 3 draft.
>
>
>
> Every issue contains a proposed response explaining the reason for closing
> the issue.  This explanation includes instructions on opening an issue in
> WCAG 3 should anybody decide that a closed issue has not been
> satisfactorily resolved.
>
>
>
> We ask that you reply to this email with +1 in support of closing all
> these issues, or that you identify the issues that you feel should remain
> open.  Any issues you feel should remain open will be transferred from the
> Silver repository to the WCAG 3 repository for additional review.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Charles Adams
>