Re: CFC - WCAG 2.1/2.2 errata

Hi everyone,

We had a late entry for an errata update:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2296/files

This update is editorial in the “Background on WCAG 2” section, updating a link and its link-text.

We discussed in today’s meeting and resolved to include the update:
https://www.w3.org/2024/11/19-ag-minutes.html#f965

For members who were not at the meeting, this is your opportunity to object if you do not think this change should be incorporated.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>

From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Wednesday, 13 November 2024 at 09:57
To: WCAG list
Subject: Re: CFC - WCAG 2.1/2.2 errata
AG Working Group members,

We have received substantially positive feedback leading up to this CfC but several objections on one specific item.

There were multiple non-dependent items within the CFC, therefore we can remove the item with objections: #3539<https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3539/> (input purpose list update).

With the removal of that item, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.

This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions.

We may re-visit the input-purpose list update separately.

Kind regards,

-Alastair


From: Alastair Campbell
Date: Monday, 4 November 2024 at 22:52
To: WCAG list
Subject: CFC - WCAG 2.1/2.2 errata
Hi everyone,

Call For Consensus — ends 8th November 2024 at 5pm Boston time.

There are a few minor normative (errata) updates to WCAG 2.1/2.2 which we would like to make, and re-publish so they are on the face of the specs.

All of these are things the group has reviewed and approved individually, so the forthcoming CFC is to check the group is happy to publish these in 2.1 and 2.2.

Few would apply to WCAG 2.0 so we aren’t proposing to add errata for 2.0.

Since the pre-CFC email two of the items have been updated based on feedback, and three have been added, marked below.

Applying to 2.2:


  *   Make "cognitive function test" definition term lowercase, aligning with other terms. https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3943/files
  *   Update to the focus-appearance note, aligning with the final text.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3657/files
  *   Updating the ‘new’ markers in 2.2.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/1481/files
  *   Removing the un-used definition for encloses.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3636/files
  *   Editorial updates to the target-size (min) SC text.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3189/files
  *   Missing comma in introduction.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3938/files

Applying to 2.1 and 2.2:

  *   Updating the definition of single-pointer, separating the a note off for clarification.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3536/files
UPDATED since the Pre-CFC email with this PR:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4070
  *   Linking up various definitions where they have not been linked before (caught as part of the WCAG2ICT work).
UPDATED since the Pre-CFC email.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3038/files
  *   Change "tablets...mobile devices" to a better structure without suggesting tablets are not mobile devices (small update to the introduction).
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3776/files
  *   Changing <ol> to <ul> when no order is intended.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3756/files
  *   Updating the style of the input purposes for syntax highlighting.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3380/files
  *   Updating the programmatically determined link-text definition to disambiguate lists and list-items.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3362/files
  *   Updating a “WCAG 2.1” reference to “WCAG 2”, so it works in both.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3707/files
  *   Update Input Purposes list to remove transaction-amount.
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3539/files
  *   Style updates, things like lowercasing “web page” (NEW since pre-CFC)
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4080/files
  *   Capitalisation fixes in the Parsing note for WCAG 2.1 (NEW since pre-CFC)
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3154/files
  *   Fix typo/incorrect word in input purpose listing (NEW since pre-CFC)
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4034/files
  *   Update changelog in guidelines/index.html (NEW since pre-CFC)
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/4123

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>