RE: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1

AG Working Group members,

As we have received only positive feedback leading up to this CfC is to approve ACT Rules Format 1.1 for first public working draft and no responses indicating that group members could not tolerate this decision, this CfC is agreed on as a consensus opinion of the working group.

This decision will be recorded at https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/wiki/Decisions__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!cC4yFDCcdymoLPk-8WkW8yVqMuXfOWGRkGsrcVOsUAaOc1bwgGORmig1TP8hyKIoVJ0-iPkDcsEtHkQF-s6Arg$>

Kind regards,

Rachael

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2024 7:36 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1
Importance: High


CAUTION: This email message has been received from an external source. Please use caution when opening attachments, or clicking on links.
Call For Consensus - ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time.

The ACT task force would like to publish version 1.1 of the ACT Rules format:
https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!bE7pOsosoI8GBnK-7Ovcy-On0Dk8W_aowOg_3_xvNC_y9ymBU77UlgcPdtJGs_dFc2N3-23qRfL8FSIvF7L_tA$>

The specific changes are detailed in this github issue:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!bE7pOsosoI8GBnK-7Ovcy-On0Dk8W_aowOg_3_xvNC_y9ymBU77UlgcPdtJGs_dFc2N3-23qRfL8FSLKjkSQOw$>

A 'diff' version comparing it to version 1.0 is also available:
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*act-rules-format*&doc2=https:**Aw3c.github.io*wcag-act*act-rules-format.html__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!bE7pOsosoI8GBnK-7Ovcy-On0Dk8W_aowOg_3_xvNC_y9ymBU77UlgcPdtJGs_dFc2N3-23qRfL8FSKrJp962A$>

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to live with" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

If you support the publication, then a reply with "+1" is useful (but not required).

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.nomensa.com/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!bE7pOsosoI8GBnK-7Ovcy-On0Dk8W_aowOg_3_xvNC_y9ymBU77UlgcPdtJGs_dFc2N3-23qRfL8FSIQT8KWvQ$>