RE: [External] : Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1

+1

From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 10:24 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] : Re: CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1

+1

Best regards,

Mary Jo Mueller
IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>>
Date: Thursday, June 6, 2024 at 7:37 AM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org<mailto:w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1
Call For Consensus — ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time. The ACT task force would like to publish version 1. 1 of the ACT Rules format: https: //w3c. github. io/wcag-act/act-rules-format. html The specific changes are detailed in this github

Call For Consensus — ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time.

The ACT task force would like to publish version 1.1 of the ACT Rules format:
https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OSJ1CzRDOe6LGd5h7OKo1lGF3WVexi7x3wJBkMSrsbKeYRirC1s_n0FLLpUQhi2ilgZLO02HV_9Z_qPeITM$>

The specific changes are detailed in this github issue:
https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OSJ1CzRDOe6LGd5h7OKo1lGF3WVexi7x3wJBkMSrsbKeYRirC1s_n0FLLpUQhi2ilgZLO02HV_9ZpQ8bgOM$>

A ‘diff’ version comparing it to version 1.0 is also available:
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*act-rules-format*&doc2=https:**Aw3c.github.io*wcag-act*act-rules-format.html__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OSJ1CzRDOe6LGd5h7OKo1lGF3WVexi7x3wJBkMSrsbKeYRirC1s_n0FLLpUQhi2ilgZLO02HV_9ZyeIuM9k$>

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

If you support the publication, then a reply with “+1” is useful (but not required).

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!OSJ1CzRDOe6LGd5h7OKo1lGF3WVexi7x3wJBkMSrsbKeYRirC1s_n0FLLpUQhi2ilgZLO02HV_9ZEZsETmU$>