- From: Roberto Scano <mail@robertoscano.info>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 10:14:18 -0400
- To: Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOULRzjKtgieTCZernkAH1=4aSe=pu5Std-yh00W-_vDqj253A@mail.gmail.com>
+1 Il lun 10 giu 2024, 10:13 Chuck Adams <charles.adams@oracle.com> ha scritto: > +1 > > > > Regards, > > Chuck > > > > *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 6, 2024 5:36 AM > *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* [External] : CFC - Publication of ACT Rules format 1.1 > *Importance:* High > > > > Call For Consensus — ends 12th June at mid-day Boston time. > > > > The ACT task force would like to publish version 1.1 of the ACT Rules > format: > > https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NCT2ULyOK4K3fa5QPbKedXgwpqipw3Wup3H8-wnpnTUgX5UQhYs2E-Cdq3YdC3emvCoMx0louFOpFdWpr00xow$> > > > > The specific changes are detailed in this github issue: > > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616 > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/3616__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NCT2ULyOK4K3fa5QPbKedXgwpqipw3Wup3H8-wnpnTUgX5UQhYs2E-Cdq3YdC3emvCoMx0louFOpFdUby1GWig$> > > > > A ‘diff’ version comparing it to version 1.0 is also available: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https://www.w3.org/TR/act-rules-format/&doc2=https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-rules-format.html > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https:**Awww.w3.org*TR*act-rules-format*&doc2=https:**Aw3c.github.io*wcag-act*act-rules-format.html__;Ly8vLy8vLy8v!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NCT2ULyOK4K3fa5QPbKedXgwpqipw3Wup3H8-wnpnTUgX5UQhYs2E-Cdq3YdC3emvCoMx0louFOpFdU7rP6ebQ$> > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > If you support the publication, then a reply with “+1” is useful (but not > required). > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!NCT2ULyOK4K3fa5QPbKedXgwpqipw3Wup3H8-wnpnTUgX5UQhYs2E-Cdq3YdC3emvCoMx0louFOpFdXbMS4lKA$> > > > > >
Received on Monday, 10 June 2024 14:14:35 UTC