- From: Roberto Scano <mail@robertoscano.info>
- Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 08:05:32 +0200
- To: Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com>
- Cc: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOULRzj=2f9jf6+ng6=edgWbQcTncr6QoNhpFdyuEKs9pyagtw@mail.gmail.com>
Agreed. Same issue of Google is happened with an e-commerce web site with mistake for gluten-free and with gluten. In this case the damage can be higher... Il gio 11 apr 2024, 03:22 Todd Libby <toddlibby@protonmail.com> ha scritto: > I agree fully with Patrick: > > > Once you bring in the "AI will do it" line of thinking, we may as well > > just remove any author requirement, and WCAG becomes just a list of > > requirements for AI user agents to massage any old web content into > > something accessible. > > Being a strong supporter against AI, because it will never work for > accessibility, we have been down this road before. I mean, Google attempted > their best shot and look where it got them. In hot water (so to speak). > > > https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/01/google-sorry-racist-auto-tag-photo-app > > and if we are ever going to learn something as a people (which we have > not), instances like this will always be why I vehemently oppose AI in tech > and accessibility. > > The article may be old, but the fact remains that AI is not the answer now > (or ever in my opinion). > > > > > > --- > Best, > > Todd Libby > > > > > > On Thursday, April 4th, 2024 at 8:08 AM, Patrick H. Lauke < > redux@splintered.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 04/04/2024 08:02, Gregg Vanderheiden RTF wrote: > > > > > I think much of our work is not forward-looking. > > > > > > We will soon have AI that can do a better job of text alternatives than > > > humans can for example. > > > And then it is unclear why we would require authors to do all this > work. > > > This applies to a LOT of things. > > > > > > As a counterpoint, Gregg ... when does it end? You've stated similar > > when it comes to things like authors needing to provide correct explicit > > markup for headings, since (to paraphrase) "AI will be able to do it". > > > > Captions, audio descriptions ... "AI will be able to do it". > > > > Colour contrast issues? "AI can detect it and change it on the fly". > > > > Once you bring in the "AI will do it" line of thinking, we may as well > > just remove any author requirement, and WCAG becomes just a list of > > requirements for AI user agents to massage any old web content into > > something accessible. > > > > P > > -- > > Patrick H. Lauke > > > > * https://www.splintered.co.uk/ > > * https://github.com/patrickhlauke > > * https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ > > * https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke > >
Received on Thursday, 11 April 2024 06:05:50 UTC