- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 12:20:42 +0200
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGOpuLA0TcUkL8io-sK8o=xMa==dk3in-Kp9L=MptiV3=w@mail.gmail.com>
Hey Alastair, I'm just putting this side by side with the corresponding ACT rule Link in context is descriptive ( https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/act/rules/5effbb/proposed/#programmatically-determined-link-context ). Couple things stand out to me. The big one is linking paragraph to the <p> element. In the testing we did for that rule that didn't seem to matter to assistive technologies. Screen readers have methods for reading out the parent text block. Whether that is a p element or not seemed irrelevant. Unless our testing was wrong (or I'm misremembering?) I don't think we should be quite so narrow as to limit to only HTML p elements, which is what we're suggesting by adding that link. I do agree with listitem over list. That was a thing that had occurred to the folks working on this ACT Rule too and is already in the rule. One addition they had also made which should probably be considered as part of this update is to add aria-describedby. That's one of the most direct ways to give context to a link. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:55 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > In a meeting we agreed to add an errata for the definition of "programmatically > determined link context > <https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/#dfn-programmatically-determined-link-context>", > in the example. > > > > The core point was that paragraph and table cell are one type of thing, > but the example in the definition uses the term "list" instead of "list > item". > > > > The change in PR 3362 <https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3362/files> makes > it 'list item', and adds a link to the HTML definition of paragraph (as > this is an HTML example). > > > > We discussed that here: > > https://www.w3.org/2023/09/19-ag-minutes#t05 > > > > It sailed through the meeting agreement, but before I CFC that does anyone > have any concerns with that update? > > > > It would apply to all WCAG 2.x versions. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2023 10:20:59 UTC