Re: CFC - Adding errata and updating understanding documents for WCAG 2.0 (take 2)

+1

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023, 2:43 PM Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L <
rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote:

> +1
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 22, 2023 2:11 PM
> *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject:* CFC - Adding errata and updating understanding documents for
> WCAG 2.0 (take 2)
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This email message has been received from an external source.
> Please use caution when opening attachments, or clicking on links.
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Thursday August 24th at 17:00 Boston time.
>
>
>
> This call is to add a new errata and update the understanding document for
> WCAG 2.0.  This will address the removal of parsing to bring WCAG 2.0 more
> in line with WCAG 2.1 and 2.2.
>
> It is an update of the previous CFC:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JulSep/0219.html
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JulSep/0219.html__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!Z5tnJYuyzlsc3RRy3HN_LZ-xEQLjaVvy6bbvNTEYoIHnqCgUtJSp12ro5C0hLKdQFHs6DIvPb32M1cBlwX_vfw$>
>
> The proposed updates are in the attachments.
>
>    - Errata: See number 13 under Editorial Errata (the notes are included
>    in the errata page).
>    - Understanding Document: The new notes are at the top of the Intent
>    section.
>
>
> Because of changes to technology since WCAG 2.0 was published we cannot
> provide a diff.
>
>
>
> The original content is at:
>
>    - Errata (original): https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/errata/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!Z5tnJYuyzlsc3RRy3HN_LZ-xEQLjaVvy6bbvNTEYoIHnqCgUtJSp12ro5C0hLKdQFHs6DIvPb32M1cBReSlSlA$>
>    and
>    - Understanding Document (original):
>    https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/Understanding/parsing
>    <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/Understanding/parsing__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!Z5tnJYuyzlsc3RRy3HN_LZ-xEQLjaVvy6bbvNTEYoIHnqCgUtJSp12ro5C0hLKdQFHs6DIvPb32M1cCGm7O-JA$>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.nomensa.com/__;!!EDx7F7x-0XSOB8YS_BQ!cYpvXq7jZCLzy7X3L5NUY5x2y4UJCBXz6RXIN34ZrEWuWEpMV4zhRA-jKZxlu1KFEVUOqGsPE9yoZUyuhbBJDQ$>
>
>
>