Re: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1

+1

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 12:24 PM Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> AWK
>
>
>
> Andrew Kirkpatrick
>
> Director, Accessibility
>
> Adobe
>
>
>
> akirkpat@adobe.com
>
> http://twitter.com/awkawk
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:02 AM
> *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Subject: *CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1
> *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:01 AM
>
>
>
> *EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.*
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 31st at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> This call is to re-publish WCAG 2.1 to include all the errata since it was
> originally published in 2018.
>
>
>
> There are various editorial updates (errata) to WCAG 2.1 that are *not*
> immediately visible to people looking at the main TR location:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
>
>
>
> Republishing would make these updates available in the default location.
>
>
>
> The changes from the current published version are highlighted in this
> version:
>
>
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2FWCAG-2.1-catchup%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html
>
>
>
> Notable updates include the note for Parsing and updates to the red-flash
> definition.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>