- From: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 12:14:06 -0400
- To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmg2sWLcgLzTkSd_AAY4DG+rg-NFvNE=b9KFQ3yfWAUizkR-A@mail.gmail.com>
+1 JF On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 11:00 AM Scott O'Hara <scott.ohara@microsoft.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > Sent from Mail <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for > Windows > > > > *From: *Pascalides, Justine <jspascal@amazon.com> > *Sent: *Tuesday, July 25, 2023 10:46 AM > *To: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>; WCAG list > (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] RE: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1 > > > > You don't often get email from jspascal@amazon.com. Learn why this is > important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> > > +1 > > > > *From:* Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 25, 2023 2:01 AM > *To:* WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1 > *Importance:* High > > > > *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know > the content is safe. > > > > Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 31st at midday Boston time. > > > > This call is to re-publish WCAG 2.1 to include all the errata since it was > originally published in 2018. > > > > There are various editorial updates (errata) to WCAG 2.1 that are *not* > immediately visible to people looking at the main TR location: > https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ > > > > Republishing would make these updates available in the default location. > > > > The changes from the current published version are highlighted in this > version: > > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2FWCAG-2.1-catchup%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html > > > > Notable updates include the note for Parsing and updates to the red-flash > definition. > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before > the CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > > > -- *John Foliot* | Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility | W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor | "I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." - Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"
Received on Tuesday, 25 July 2023 16:14:27 UTC