Re: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1

Hi Andrew,

As far as I can tell it should be working as the individual URLs both work, so I think it’s just having a capacity problem. FWIW I’m getting the same thing at the moment, but it was fine earlier.

Please try again in a few minutes, or an hour perhaps?

-Alastair


From: Andrew Kirkpatrick <akirkpat@adobe.com>
Date: Tuesday, 25 July 2023 at 15:21
To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: Re: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1

In general I support this but the diff isn’t loading and I get “An error (500 Internal Server Error) occured trying to get https://labs.w3.org/spec-generator/?type=respec&url=https://raw.githack.com/w3c/wcag/WCAG-2.1-catchup/guidelines/index.html.”

Thanks,
AWK

Andrew Kirkpatrick
Director, Accessibility
Adobe

akirkpat@adobe.com<mailto:akirkpat@adobe.com>
http://twitter.com/awkawk


From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:02 AM
To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1
Resent-From: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 5:01 AM


EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments.



Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 31st at midday Boston time.



This call is to re-publish WCAG 2.1 to include all the errata since it was originally published in 2018.



There are various editorial updates (errata) to WCAG 2.1 that are not immediately visible to people looking at the main TR location: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/



Republishing would make these updates available in the default location.



The changes from the current published version are highlighted in this version:

https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2FWCAG-2.1-catchup%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html



Notable updates include the note for Parsing and updates to the red-flash definition.



If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com/>