Re: CFC - Republish of WCAG 2.1

You may want to check for mention of WCAG 2.2 where it shouldn't be
included. For example, the following is found under "Layers of Guidance":

   -

   *Success Criteria *- For each guideline, testable success criteria are
   provided to allow WCAG 2.0  2.2  to be used ...
   -

   *Sufficient and Advisory Techniques *- For each of the *guidelines
*and *success
   criteria *in the WCAG 2.0  2.1  document itself...

This was the only place in the documentation where I saw this, but I could
have missed an instance.

On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:02 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Monday July 31st at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> This call is to re-publish WCAG 2.1 to include all the errata since it was
> originally published in 2018.
>
>
>
> There are various editorial updates (errata) to WCAG 2.1 that are *not*
> immediately visible to people looking at the main TR location:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
>
>
>
> Republishing would make these updates available in the default location.
>
>
>
> The changes from the current published version are highlighted in this
> version:
>
>
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG21%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Flabs.w3.org%2Fspec-generator%2F%3Ftype%3Drespec%26url%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fraw.githack.com%2Fw3c%2Fwcag%2FWCAG-2.1-catchup%2Fguidelines%2Findex.html
>
>
>
> Notable updates include the note for Parsing and updates to the red-flash
> definition.
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>