- From: Jennifer Strickland <jstrickland@mitre.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 22:26:52 +0000
- To: "Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>, Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <SA0PR09MB7002F287F0F853341DD1E1FFB03BA@SA0PR09MB7002.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
+1 From: Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L <rmontgomery@loc.gov> Date: Monday, July 17, 2023 at 2:00 PM To: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com>, WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org> Subject: [EXT] Re: CFC - Update WCAG 3 Working Draft That was a correct assumption. Corrected below. From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@ us. ibm. com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1: 57 PM To: Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L <rmontgomery@ loc. gov>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@ w3. org>; Silver TF <public-silver@ w3. org> That was a correct assumption. Corrected below. ________________________________ From: Mary Jo Mueller <maryjom@us.ibm.com> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:57 PM To: Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L <rmontgomery@loc.gov>; WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>; Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org> Subject: Re: CFC - Update WCAG 3 Working Draft CAUTION: This email message has been received from an external source. Please use caution when opening attachments, or clicking on links. +1 under the assumption that the pre-cfc email “didn’t” raise additional concerns, which I assume was a typo. Best regards, Mary Jo Mueller IBM Accessibility Standards Program Manager From: Bradley Montgomery, Rachael L <rmontgomery@loc.gov> Date: Monday, July 17, 2023 at 1:41 PM To: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, Silver TF <public-silver@w3.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] CFC - Update WCAG 3 Working Draft Call For Consensus — ends Thursday July 21st at 2pm Boston time. We previously agreed update the WCAG 3 Working Draft from the Editor's Draft Our pre-cfc email did raise any additional concerns. The next step (in a future CFC) will be to agree Call For Consensus — ends Thursday July 21st at 2pm Boston time. We previously agreed update the WCAG 3 Working Draft from the Editor's Draft<https://w3c.github.io/silver/guidelines/> Our pre-cfc email did not raise any additional concerns. The next step (in a future CFC) will be to agree the re-publishing of WCAG 2.1 & 2.0 in order that these notes (and all the previous errata) are visible in the latest versions of each. If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline. Kind regards, -Alastair
Received on Monday, 17 July 2023 22:27:12 UTC