Re: Tweaking the understanding for 1.4.11 as an incorrect example is causing confusion

+1 Same!

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:12 AM Melanie Philipp <melanie.philipp@deque.com>
wrote:

> +1 Yes please! I have to correct that with our team repeatedly.
>
> *Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | *Director, Services Methodology
> | 540-848-5220
> Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
> www.deque.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 11:10 AM Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Jumping the queue a bit, but as this has just bubbled up in a discussion
>> on WAI-IG as causing confusion...any chance this could be looked
>> at/merged? It's not making any normative change, just removes the
>> ambiguous example for an already quite complex SC
>>
>> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2574
>>
>> --
>> Patrick H. Lauke
>>
>> https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
>> https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
>> https://mastodon.social/@patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
>>
>>

Received on Thursday, 13 July 2023 17:00:37 UTC