Re: Target size Pre-CFC

Thank you, Alastair - even though I'd rather not drop the lists exception,
I'm comfortable with that interpretation if that is agreed on and explained
in adequate examples in the Understanding doc.

*Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | *Director, Services Methodology
| 540-848-5220
Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good
www.deque.com



On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 1:30 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:

> Hi Melanie,
>
>
>
> > -1 to removing lists from the Inline exception without some
> understanding / clarity on its impact on various types of links-in-lists
> with mixes of static text and no static text. For example this wikipedia
> page:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990
> <https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAmericans_with_Disabilities_Act_of_1990&data=05%7C01%7Cacampbell%40nomensa.com%7Ce203fccb4dcd461b4d8408db30732fb6%7Cebea4ad6fbbf43bd8449c56e26692c35%7C0%7C0%7C638157043505770973%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=OTxmTbaQARjfQV%2B8BCdFo%2BYhI6fBnLGTB1m40QXNjUY%3D&reserved=0>,
> under the References, Further Reading, External links sections.
>
>
>
> Acknowledging that I would have preferred to keep that, the last part of
> the bullet should align the results. We can use the previous work to
> include examples in the understanding document.
>
>
>
> The negative (that I raised yesterday) is that including visible lists
> explicitly makes it quicker and easier to assess what is in/out of scope.
> However, the results shouldn’t be very different.
>
>
>
> From the example Wikipedia page:
>
> - References, further reading: Each have non-link text in the list items
> defining the height, therefore meeting the exception.
>
> - External links: Some of them have non-link text defining the height, so
> those definitely meet the exception. We should include in the understanding
> whether, because they are part of the same list, that exception applies to
> all items in the list.
>
>
>
> The one which would change is “See also” (above references). Those links
> would not be exempt because there is no non-link text.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>