Hey Alastair,
-1
We very much should have surveyed this first. There is a lot of nuance in
here that we need to get right. For starters, I do not think success
criteria should be abbreviated as "SC" in public documents.
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:36 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> Call For Consensus — ends Tuesday 28th March at 1PM Boston time.
>
>
>
> Following from a previous CFC which did not pass:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0201.html
>
>
>
> We discussed an alternative:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0282.html
>
>
>
> That alternative appears to have support (including from those objecting
> to the previous CFC).
>
>
>
> The change has been implemented here:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3116
>
>
>
> It adds the proposed note to the SC text, and updates the understanding
> document. The understanding document states that it has been removed from
> 2.2 but remains in WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 with a note (and replicates the note
> there).
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>
>
>
>
>
--
*Wilco Fiers*
Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator
ACT Task Force
