Conformance Model proposals

A quick review of both options, and it is still unclear whether conformance
will be at the page or site level. Also unclear is how "multiple instances"
will be addressed.

For example, Option One
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1toDNN_WE-CfzIyT_sKsYB7qvDqeliHsch9KPpfsGzcU/edit#heading=h.ogrp57nqfxuj>
references video, but what will happen if a web page has 2 videos: one
meets all of the requirements and the other doesn't?
What if a website has 2 videos on separate pages, and again one meets all
of the requirements and the other doesn't?

I've been saying from the beginning, a conformance model that doesn't also
address scoring in context is an incomplete conformance model. Unless of
course the goal remains that it has to be perfect *everywhere* or it fails
the requirement at the site level (assuming conformance is shifted from the
page level to the site level - still unclear at this time).

I look forward to seeing what the Monday session brings forward.

JF
-- 
*John Foliot* |
Senior Industry Specialist, Digital Accessibility |
W3C Accessibility Standards Contributor |

"I made this so long because I did not have time to make it shorter." -
Pascal "links go places, buttons do things"