- From: Shawn Thompson <shawn@shawnthompson.ca>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 06:56:12 -0500
- To: "Alastair Campbell" <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <FC715611-D38F-4990-870E-DC4220D6C1C9@shawnthompson.ca>
+1 **Shawn Thompson, WAS** Web Accessibility Technical Advisor | Conseiller technique en accessibilité Web Montreal, Quebec (613) 363-7468 shawn@shawnthompson.ca On 8 Mar 2023, at 12:58, Alastair Campbell wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends Friday Wed 15th at midday Boston time. > > The group has discussed what to do with 4.1.1 Parsing in WCAG 2.0 & > 2.1 now that it has been removed from WCAG 2.2. > > From the discussion: > https://www.w3.org/2023/03/07-ag-minutes#item10 > > Following the same approach as WCAG 2.2 was the preferred approach, > where the SC text would be removed and replaced with a note that says > why it has been removed. > > The specific changes are detailed in these two pull requests: > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3093 > https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3094 > > Survey results: > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc5/results#xq23 > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have > not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you > “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group > know before the CfC deadline. > > Assuming the group agrees to this change, there is likely to be a > public review before we can re-publish WCAG 2.0 & 2.1. > https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#last-call-review > > Kind regards, > > -Alastair > > -- > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://www.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 9 March 2023 11:56:27 UTC