Re: CFC - 4.1.1 Parsing in WCAG 2.0 and 2.1

+1

On Wednesday, 8 March 2023, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:

> Call For Consensus — ends Friday Wed 15th at midday Boston time.
>
>
>
> The group has discussed what to do with 4.1.1 Parsing in WCAG 2.0 & 2.1
> now that it has been removed from WCAG 2.2.
>
>
>
> From the discussion:
>
> https://www.w3.org/2023/03/07-ag-minutes#item10
>
>
>
> Following the same approach as WCAG 2.2 was the preferred approach, where
> the SC text would be removed and replaced with a note that says why it has
> been removed.
>
>
>
> The specific changes are detailed in these two pull requests:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3093
>
> https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/3094
>
>
>
> Survey results: https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-
> misc5/results#xq23
>
>
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not
> been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not
> being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before
> the CfC deadline.
>
>
>
> Assuming the group agrees to this change, there is likely to be a public
> review before we can re-publish WCAG 2.0 & 2.1.
>
> https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#last-call-review
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> -Alastair
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com
>


-- 
--

Regards

Steve Faulkner
Web Standards messaging
one t-shirt at a time
https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/HTMLZ

Received on Wednesday, 8 March 2023 20:26:41 UTC