RE: CFC - Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

+1

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 6:13 PM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] : CFC - Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

Hi everyone,

Call for Consensus - ends Wednesday January 18th at 5pm Boston time.

The Working Group has approved CFCs for updated normative content in WCAG 2.2 and it is ready to re-start the Candidate Recommendation stage.

Recent changes came from these CFCs:
Removing 4.1.1: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0010.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0010.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIarkvdfP0Bg$>
Target size: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0047.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0047.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIarkcR2VyHw$>
And other miscellaneous changes:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022OctDec/0131.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022OctDec/0131.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIarmoNHey_A$>
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0014.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0014.html__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIark4UkTpeg$>

You can see a diff of the current draft compared to the previous CR version here:
https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG22%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.w3.org*2FTR*2FWCAG22*2F&doc2=https*3A*2F*2Fw3c.github.io*2Fwcag*2Fguidelines*2F22*2F__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIarnzZNNrzA$>

Note that some changes are simply because the editors draft does not include CR content. Primarily that is in the introduction, but it is also missing the "at risk" markers. Those will still be included in the CR version.

If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you "not being able to tolerate" this decision, please let the group know before the CfC deadline.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!PuXOT7-zc8bBR5t592xAtEJkhxmlmcgHGipKFQRIA-x2sDmb328oPpiAea6g7MA9kzaU-a1KYlkIarnbbTyW2w$>