- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2023 14:04:48 +0000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vnog9mjeqPkjMRgHrGqq0mKMrhOruQYGjp2uN99S+GgDw@mail.gmail.com>
+1 On Friday, 13 January 2023, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > Call for Consensus – ends Wednesday January 18th at 5pm Boston time. > > > > The Working Group has approved CFCs for updated normative content in WCAG > 2.2 and it is ready to re-start the Candidate Recommendation stage. > > > > Recent changes came from these CFCs: > > Removing 4.1.1: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/ > Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0010.html > > Target size: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/ > 0047.html > > And other miscellaneous changes: > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022OctDec/0131.html > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0014.html > > > > You can see a diff of the current draft compared to the previous CR > version here: > > https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F% > 2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG22%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github. > io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F > > > > Note that some changes are simply because the editors draft does not > include CR content. Primarily that is in the introduction, but it is also > missing the “at risk” markers. Those will still be included in the CR > version. > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to tolerate” this decision, please let the group know before the > CfC deadline. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > > > > > -- -- Regards Steve Faulkner Web Standards messaging one t-shirt at a time https://www.etsy.com/uk/shop/HTMLZ
Received on Friday, 13 January 2023 14:05:02 UTC