Re: CFC - Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation

+1


On 13/01/2023 1:12 AM, Alastair Campbell wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> Call for Consensus – ends WednesdayJanuary 18th at 5pm Boston time.
>
> The Working Group has approved CFCs for updated normative content in 
> WCAG 2.2 and it is ready to re-start the Candidate Recommendation stage.
>
> Recent changes came from these CFCs:
>
> Removing 4.1.1: 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0010.html
>
> Target size: 
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0047.html
>
> And other miscellaneous changes:
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2022OctDec/0131.html
>
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2023JanMar/0014.html
>
> You can see a diff of the current draft compared to the previous CR 
> version here:
>
> https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG22%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F 
> <https://services.w3.org/htmldiff?doc1=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2FWCAG22%2F&doc2=https%3A%2F%2Fw3c.github.io%2Fwcag%2Fguidelines%2F22%2F>
>
> Note that some changes are simply because the editors draft does not 
> include CR content. Primarily that is in the introduction, but it is 
> also missing the “at risk” markers. Those will still be included in 
> the CR version.
>
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to tolerate” this decision, please let the group know 
> before the CfC deadline.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> -Alastair
>
> -- 
>
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com>
>
-- 
Léonie Watson (she/her)
Director
https://tetralogical.com