- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:58:50 +0200
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- Cc: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGPr3rOWFLhYdoLh3uEeyHgomwtOzV2_ZhNmxVhhAt=uuA@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Alastair, This is much better I think. I'm not an expert on this, but I think the grammar of the last bit is slightly off, and should probably be this: > intersect other targets, nor the circles of other undersized targets. This has three changes: 1. Plural instead of singular. Since you're saying "the circles do not intersect" I think plural for the rest of that is right? 2. "nor" instead of "or", I don't think those circles can intersect with small targets, even if their circle isn't intersecting 3. added a comma On Tue, Apr 4, 2023 at 11:53 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > > We had some discussion about this today, including some after meeting > ideas thrown in: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N38qrHOJSXW-OrJI7GiSjQwaYZxh5OBDJ36No7p2Ax4/edit#heading=h.fyovk9vwylou > > > > I think the one that would pass most people’s concerns was: > > > > *Spacing*: Undersized targets (those less than 24 by 24 CSS pixels) are > positioned so that if a 24 CSS pixel diameter circle is centered on the > bounding box of each, the circles do not intersect another target or the > circle for another undersized target. > > > > Personally, I prefer the more concise version, however, I don’t think that > will clear objections. So the question now is: Would anyone object to that? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > > > > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Wednesday, 5 April 2023 10:59:08 UTC