Re: WCAG 2.2 easy misc issues

+1 

gregg


> On Dec 7, 2022, at 3:07 PM, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone, 
>  
> There are a few items from the survey that I think we can finalise asynchronously as they were very close.
>  
> Change First Note 3.2.6 Consistent Help to align better with SC text #2408 <>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq2
>  
> This was 14 in favour of merging the PR, 2 with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested), I’ll merge.
>  
>  
> Note in Accessible Authentication needs to be reworded #2714 <>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq3
>  
> 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula and Oliver thought it changed the meaning, however, it now directly refers to the intended bullets in the SC.
> I’ll merge unless someone replies to object.
>  
>  
> 3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764 <>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq4
>  
> 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula thought that readers might not understand the history and that we cannot change the numbering now. However, this is the last chance we have to re-order things without an errata.  I’ll merge.
>  
>  
> Normative wording inconsistencies for Accessible Authentication SCs #2715 <>
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq6
> 15 in favour, 1 agree with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested).
> I’ll merge.
>  
> Any objections please reply soon. These SCs will come back via a (probably grouped) CFC as they are normative.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> -Alastair
>  
> -- 
>  
> @alastc / www.nomensa.com <http://www.nomensa.com/>