- From: Jaunita George <jaunita_george@navyfederal.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 18:50:52 +0000
- To: Melanie Philipp <melanie.philipp@deque.com>, Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
- CC: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY4PR06MB322270D0F25CE754C366E0DCFD1D9@CY4PR06MB3222.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
+1 From: Melanie Philipp <melanie.philipp@deque.com> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 1:50 PM To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Cc: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: [External] Re: WCAG 2.2 easy misc issues ATTENTION This email originated outside of Navy Federal. Please exercise caution when clicking links, opening attachments or responding to this email. +1 Melanie Philipp, CPACC, WAS | Director, Services Methodology | 540-848-5220 Deque Systems - Accessibility for Good www.deque.com<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1PjHcyR39ZdtxRPaUYfptvhS8mgUMh4eQ2uq5e1FORjdKlibrG4UpX2_HMvlbd8kUxF44xZhP_nrA5s91ezFxsG2eDsM9ch07IC5rZmTOp6IgQDlboRVWak1JGwwa3QHQhfsgCIHP-SOCHCHxv70A7qgNDiLSbpJkbVZJQGfKf9SgezRhq0bTp8I3gFJyME9dPxkrpjnnHBp6s3ZXATZZ6CpybRo8ghxNVZcDxJV463e8ypss7XvJP_l1gHKYfjek4mnN5y_MpzEDxWmaiHwabrNRmXXGDqktJKwcfb4tqw-fg8VhMmoY0DB8LodVMmcONQdW2zIzib5aoeuilCPLlrWO1FGLO-oABeCePLZUoIFKK1ANGyCbZVJTnm0x8ZD5xq0l8E-xCNafu3i6kRq6X7bWiBwBCf4pwcPu083cjuPOysdAsEcrHGCTVHQR-DWlBfSB6izRoK8Rj0-zsz8PFQ/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.deque.com> On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 6:08 PM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com<mailto:acampbell@nomensa.com>> wrote: Hi everyone, There are a few items from the survey that I think we can finalise asynchronously as they were very close. Change First Note 3.2.6 Consistent Help to align better with SC text #2408 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq2 This was 14 in favour of merging the PR, 2 with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested), I’ll merge. Note in Accessible Authentication needs to be reworded #2714 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq3 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula and Oliver thought it changed the meaning, however, it now directly refers to the intended bullets in the SC. I’ll merge unless someone replies to object. 3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq4 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula thought that readers might not understand the history and that we cannot change the numbering now. However, this is the last chance we have to re-order things without an errata. I’ll merge. Normative wording inconsistencies for Accessible Authentication SCs #2715 https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq6 15 in favour, 1 agree with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested). I’ll merge. Any objections please reply soon. These SCs will come back via a (probably grouped) CFC as they are normative. Kind regards, -Alastair -- @alastc / www.nomensa.com<http://secure-web.cisco.com/1eb8E5TDrkxHe4NayZ4CcSGjz3CmbfxGL5f9lTAR9b7fy22-3XByj5vMcV27dHstLA25UYCjJ_Y-uELvn1BE_ud1Tqt-BkqMd5Dojh2Td9TzeOpI63KW5_Q5Ya9rQ0NzjzPsQVX7AP98_W_-qXhB3y2dAabGFbBmZvJQvjXynzKkxUDm1qGi2jBylBi78Mr-dJyqOpFF0zjB7wwmM-R6hCmPnZ5oPlYGG0pMvsZs6h-6v_X4KBKdTMRtXdWjqJeHJVimbQOO_bStxlQJgE6QmDxmTynpPEoZ18Sw9Pier7Rl2WCLD78vAamL82ivzTPnxFDFR5-VQ1UfPFdAgVTIyDEoQxP5MDh1XFPcckyR7gWkx249LHFhyRXCmn3DjMbdCwNdHVbmLRFY0W0_Fd58P9co0eMtzPp_u0AjHT3rAvd9Lk7-ifTuoaMTN6KRa9P31V5UOENwCAow7oavfsrOP9g/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nomensa.com>
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2022 18:51:17 UTC