RE: WCAG 2.2 easy misc issues

+1

From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:07 PM
To: WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org) <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Subject: [External] : WCAG 2.2 easy misc issues

Hi everyone,

There are a few items from the survey that I think we can finalise asynchronously as they were very close.

Change First Note 3.2.6 Consistent Help to align better with SC text #2408
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq2<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results*xq2__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L4LwxjKdJWTJhlTE_lN74as6_aOyC4ICho5cT-uaRXMQNcgYUMAn8Ded9jevt7MTpgCRws3zWQG2dhbh7CFr5g$>

This was 14 in favour of merging the PR, 2 with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested), I'll merge.


Note in Accessible Authentication needs to be reworded #2714
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq3<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results*xq3__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L4LwxjKdJWTJhlTE_lN74as6_aOyC4ICho5cT-uaRXMQNcgYUMAn8Ded9jevt7MTpgCRws3zWQG2dhbdmxXm7g$>

15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula and Oliver thought it changed the meaning, however, it now directly refers to the intended bullets in the SC.
I'll merge unless someone replies to object.


3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq4<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results*xq4__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L4LwxjKdJWTJhlTE_lN74as6_aOyC4ICho5cT-uaRXMQNcgYUMAn8Ded9jevt7MTpgCRws3zWQG2dhY5cHpMkQ$>

15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula thought that readers might not understand the history and that we cannot change the numbering now. However, this is the last chance we have to re-order things without an errata.  I'll merge.


Normative wording inconsistencies for Accessible Authentication SCs #2715
https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq6<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results*xq6__;Iw!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L4LwxjKdJWTJhlTE_lN74as6_aOyC4ICho5cT-uaRXMQNcgYUMAn8Ded9jevt7MTpgCRws3zWQG2dha2Vebmxg$>
15 in favour, 1 agree with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested).
I'll merge.

Any objections please reply soon. These SCs will come back via a (probably grouped) CFC as they are normative.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

--

@alastc / www.nomensa.com<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/www.nomensa.com__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!L4LwxjKdJWTJhlTE_lN74as6_aOyC4ICho5cT-uaRXMQNcgYUMAn8Ded9jevt7MTpgCRws3zWQG2dhaCmZk9QQ$>