- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 13:57:26 +0100
- To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
- Cc: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHVyjGPue_m8KYj=7bhDouCoaYJXHz+tpd6uP9UD4qkxHmA7yw@mail.gmail.com>
+! LGTM On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 1:20 PM Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael < rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote: > +1 to merges > > > > *From: *Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> > *Date: *Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 6:08 PM > *To: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Subject: *WCAG 2.2 easy misc issues > *Resent-From: *WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> > *Resent-Date: *Wednesday, December 7, 2022 at 6:08 PM > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > There are a few items from the survey that I think we can finalise > asynchronously as they were very close. > > > > *Change First Note 3.2.6 Consistent Help to align better with SC text > #2408 * > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq2 > > > > This was 14 in favour of merging the PR, 2 with adjustment (but no > adjustment suggested), I’ll merge. > > > > > > *Note in Accessible Authentication needs to be reworded #2714* > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq3 > > > > 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula and Oliver thought it changed the > meaning, however, it now directly refers to the intended bullets in the SC. > I’ll merge unless someone replies to object. > > > > > > *3.3.9 Redundant Entry out of order #2764 * > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq4 > > > > 15 in favour, 2 something else. Gundula thought that readers might not > understand the history and that we cannot change the numbering now. > However, this is the last chance we have to re-order things without an > errata. I’ll merge. > > > > > > *Normative wording inconsistencies for Accessible Authentication SCs #2715 > * > > https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/wcag22-misc-normative/results#xq6 > > 15 in favour, 1 agree with adjustment (but no adjustment suggested). > > I’ll merge. > > > > Any objections please reply soon. These SCs will come back via a (probably > grouped) CFC as they are normative. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -Alastair > > > > -- > > > > @alastc / www.nomensa.com > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: deque_logo_180p.gif
Received on Thursday, 8 December 2022 12:57:50 UTC