- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:32:24 +0000
- To: "w3c-wai-gl@w3.org" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Oops, meant to send to GL, rather than IG. Apologies. P -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Semi-regular WCAG repository question Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:17:45 +0000 Resent-From: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 12:17:30 +0000 From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk> To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Hey all, I know focus has recently been on 2.2, of course, but in the meantime, the amount of open issues (590) and pull requests (205) (let alone branches (321)) on the WCAG repository is still at an almost insurmountable number. If I remember right, there's a sub-group looking at clearing WCAG issues/PRs related to 2.0/2.1 meeting on Fridays (a group which I unfortunately have no time to join due to scheduling clashes), but... maybe an initial triage list of PRs that are worth expediting are the ones marked as "Survey - Ready for"? There's 37 there, with the oldest from 2019? It may also be an idea, once these are worked through, to essentially do a big "anything older than X years will be summarily closed, unless you leave a comment about why it's still necessary" cut-off, for all issues/PRs? and maybe a big review of which of the 321 branches are actually still needed/relevant? P -- Patrick H. Lauke https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke
Received on Monday, 5 December 2022 12:32:37 UTC