- From: Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 12:41:00 +0200
- To: "Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael" <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
- Cc: WCAG <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 10:41:25 UTC
Hey folks, I wanted to ask if the group considered having WCAG2ICT become a W3C Statement (https://www.w3.org/2021/Process-20211102/#statement), rather than a Group Note. W3C Statements weren't a thing when WCAG2ICT was initially developed, but it is now. It would give more weight to the document if it had the full endorsement of the W3C, rather than it merely being a working group decision. On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 1:56 AM Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael < rmontgomery@loc.gov> wrote: > Call For Consensus — ends Wednesday October 26th at midnight Boston time. > > > > The WCAG2ICT Task Force and Accessibility Guidelines Working Group has > come to consensus on the WCAG2ICT Work Statement. You can review the works > statement at WCAG2ICT Draft Work Statement > <https://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/task-forces/wcag2ict/work-statement> > > > > If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have not > been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you “not > being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know before the > CfC deadline. > > > > -- *Wilco Fiers* Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force
Received on Friday, 21 October 2022 10:41:25 UTC