Re: CFC - Move WCAG 2.2 to Candidate Recommendation (Take 2)

+1

On 26/08/2022 18:19, Alastair Campbell wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Call for Consensus – ends Tuesday August 30^th at 2pm Boston time (a 
> shorter time as this is take 2).
> 
> The Working Group has approvedCFCs for all new normative content in WCAG 
> 2.2 and it is ready to move to Candidate Recommendation.
> 
> The draft is 
> athttps://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#new-features-in-wcag-2-2 
> <https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#new-features-in-wcag-2-2>
> 
> If you have concerns about this proposed consensus position that have 
> not been discussed already and feel that those concerns result in you 
> “not being able to live with” this decision, please let the group know 
> before theCFCdeadline.
> 
> An outline of changes since the last CFC is below.
> 
>   * Several (proposed) WCAG 2.1/2.0 errata have been tackled. We also
>     agreed to re-publish WCAG 2.1 so the errata will show up in the main
>     spec, and we can tackle more of them before re-publication.
> 
>   * The Flash provisions have been updated.
> 
>   * The exception for Accessibility Authentication has been changed as
>     part of the re-structuring (no change to meaning/requirement).
>     https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#accessible-authentication-no-exception
>     <https://w3c.github.io/wcag/guidelines/22/#accessible-authentication-no-exception>
> 
>   * Focus appearance:
>       o The first line was updated to address the ‘persistence’ objection.
>       o The sub-components aspect was updated.
>       o The SC will be marked at risk due to complexity.
>       o We have added a note on interpreting the visual aspect for
>         sizing, we’re just narrowing down the wording/terms on that
>         currently.
>       o The user-agent survey was very balanced, so checking previous
>         results on the same topic the chairs interpret the consensus
>         view is to use the current exceptions, status quo.
> 
>   * Focus obscured: No change to the SC, but we are planning to add a
>     cross-reference in the understanding document to focus-appearance
>     for semi-opaque scenarios.
> 


-- 
Patrick H. Lauke

https://www.splintered.co.uk/ | https://github.com/patrickhlauke
https://flickr.com/photos/redux/ | https://www.deviantart.com/redux
twitter: @patrick_h_lauke | skype: patrick_h_lauke

Received on Saturday, 27 August 2022 23:50:15 UTC