- From: Bradley-Montgomery, Rachael <rmontgomery@loc.gov>
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:29:52 +0000
- To: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com>, "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2022 12:30:08 UTC
+1 to this change. From: Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 8:00 AM To: "WCAG list (w3c-wai-gl@w3.org)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Subject: Focus not "obscured" to "overlapped" Resent-From: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org> Resent-Date: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 at 7:59 AM Hi everyone, The last (very last, I hope) potentially normative issue on WCAG 2.2 is: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/issues/2583 Summary: Is it leaving a hole that the component/indicator could be behind a semi-opaque layer? If so, should we change the SC to talk about overlapping instead of obscuring? E.g. When a <a>user interface component</a> receives keyboard focus, the component is not entirely overlapped by author-created content. That means opacity doesn’t figure into the scope, if it overlaps it overlaps. That change is implemented in: https://github.com/w3c/wcag/pull/2634/files Does that work? Any objections? -Alastair
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2022 12:30:08 UTC