Was talking with Wilco about "Adaptive Tests" And I thought of something that we may need to keep in mind. For standards (for formally adopted international standards) you can only refer to existing - non-changing - adopted standards or references. You can’t have a standard that refers normatively to a future document - or a document that can change in the future. That is why standards always refer to other standards by their date. So I think we can have adaptive tests - but if they refer to non-normative or changing docs then they can’t be in a 'required' provision. A REGULATION can but a standard can’t. At least not any of the standards Ive worked on in international standards groups. Sooo — a new angle to think about. Provisions that are not part of conformance but that might become part of an accessibility regulation. Not sure exactly how this would work - or if it would work at all. But just a thought… For example — you can’t have a standard Gregg Vanderheiden gregg@vanderheiden.us > On Aug 22, 2022, at 1:29 AM, Wilco Fiers <wilco.fiers@deque.com> wrote: > > Hey folk, > The Test Types & Terminology subgroup meeting is set for Monday August 22nd 8am Eastern. > > Agenda > ------ > - Review Protocols example > - Review Test Type foundations > - Presenting to AGWG > > Meeting Details > --------------- > - IRC: https://irc.w3.org/?channels=#silver-test-types <https://irc.w3.org/?channels=#silver-test-types> > - Zoom details; Coordinate via IRC > > -- > Wilco Fiers > Axe-core & Axe-linter product owner - WCAG 3 Project Manager - Facilitator ACT Task Force > > > <deque_logo_180p.gif>Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2022 00:59:31 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 23 August 2022 00:59:33 UTC